You are viewing the site in preview mode

Skip to main content

Table 5 Effect estimates for saturated (0.c) 1 and best-fitting models (7.1) of correct choices in the PRLT (controlling for Group)

From: Decision-making inflexibility in a reversal learning task is associated with severity of problem gambling symptoms but not with a diagnosis of substance use disorder

Fixed effects Saturated model Best-fitting model
OR CI p OR CI p
Intercept 1.49 1.27–1.74  < 0.001 1.49 1.27–1.74  < 0.001
Log-trial 1.18 1.09–1.28  < 0.001 1.18 1.09–1.28  < 0.001
Phase C1 0.85 0.79–0.93  < 0.001 0.85 0.79–0.93  < 0.001
Phase C2 0.77 0.70–0.83  < 0.001 0.77 0.70–0.83  < 0.001
Phase C3 0.89 0.82–0.97 0.007 0.89 0.82–0.97 0.007
Group 1.02 0.82–1.27 0.849 1.02 0.82–1.27 0.849
SOGS 0.92 0.80–1.05 0.234 0.95 0.85–1.06 0.363
Log-trial × C1 0.97 0.92–1.01 0.158 0.97 0.92–1.01 0.153
Log-trial × C2 1.04 1.00–1.09 0.075 1.04 1.00–1.09 0.075
Log-trial × C3 1.09 1.04–1.14  < 0.001 1.09 1.04–1.14  < 0.001
Group × C1 1.01 0.88–1.16 0.870 1.01 0.88–1.16 0.869
Group × C2 1.07 0.93–1.23 0.337 1.07 0.93–1.23 0.342
Group × C3 1.16 1.01–1.33 0.039 1.16 1.01–1.33 0.039
Log-trial × SOGS 0.97 0.90–1.05 0.440    
SOGS × C1 0.96 0.90–1.03 0.258 0.96 0.90–1.03 0.261
SOGS × C2 0.92 0.86–0.99 0.019 0.92 0.86–0.99 0.018
SOGS × C3 0.95 0.89–1.02 0.160 0.95 0.89–1.02 0.163
Log-trial × SOGS × C1 0.99 0.95–1.04 0.776    
Log-trial × SOGS × C2 1.04 0.99–1.09 0.119    
Log-trial × SOGS × C3 0.99 0.94–1.04 0.651    
Random effects
 σ2 3.29      
 τ00 0.13Participant      
 τ11 0.05Log-trial|Participant      
 ρ01 1.00      
 ICC 0.05      
 N 50      
  1. Significant p values are in italics
Back to article page

BMC Psychology

ISSN: 2050-7283

Contact us